TMC Labs
January 2002

 

Click To Meet For Microsoft Exchange

First Virtual Communications
3393 Octavius Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95054
P: 800-241-7463
F: 408-988-7077
www.fvc.com

Price: $30,000 for entry-level system that supports up to 15 concurrent active users and up to 10 multipoint participants and an unlimited number of registered users; includes Conference Server MCU and all Click to Meet software components.

Editors' Choice Award

RATINGS (0-5)
Installation: 4.5
Documentation: 4.5
Features: 4.5
GUI: 4.5
Overall: A-


There are many forms of communication via IP, whether it is simple e-mail and instant messaging or more complex communication, such as video conferencing, Web conferencing with collaboration features, and H.323 or SIP calling. These applications have their benefits but are usually administered separately. In these cases, they have not been used to their fullest potential. Meanwhile, scheduling and managing these applications becomes lost in the shuffle. The Click to Meet framework attempts to alleviate these management nightmares while also combining these technologies so that they can perform together with utmost productivity.

INSTALLATION & CONFIGURATION
For better performance, TMC Labs decided to separate the Conference Server (First Virtual’s software MCU product) and Click to Meet for Microsoft Exchange on two different computers. The software installations only took a few minutes and were very straightforward. We should note, however, that these servers must be statically assigned to ensure that the servers always maintain the same IP address and for the software to always be correctly administered.

When the IP addresses were set, we logged into the Conference Server and clicked Conferences. No error appeared, which confirmed that the MCU was working properly. If there were problems or users wanted to use this Web interface to administer their configurations, there are useful help files available -- just click on the Help button. For any Click to Meet configuration and usability issues via Exchange, the user can refer to the detailed, well-organized online documentation, but there are no help files on the Exchange Click to Meet screens themselves.

From there, we switched to the Click to Meet for Exchange server, which integrated Click to Meet and Exchange with a few clean, well designed interfaces. One of the screens is the Click to Meet Conferencing Provider Properties, where we could check whether or not the MCU server was running, as well as perform a test to ensure that the server settings were configured successfully. Other settings include Web templates used for customizing the look and feel of the video Web conferencing, enabling instant messaging conferencing, and specifying a gatekeeper to employ (if any), including the internal MCU gatekeeper for use with smaller businesses.

Next, we set up the users that could be included when scheduling video conferences. To do this, we simply brought up the active directory for users and computers and added the users just like we would have done in a normal Microsoft Exchange environment. From there, we looked at the properties for our new users, which included a Click to Meet tab in addition to the regular Exchange properties. Here, we made sure that the user settings were correct, then we enabled instant messaging for most of our users. Under the Click to Meet tab, we needed to enable the type of video conferencing that the user was employing, whether it was an endpoint, a room-based system, or a streaming server. A video conferencing endpoint was enabled for anyone using an individual camera on his or her computer and who could use Microsoft Outlook for scheduling video conferences. The software used here could be either NetMeeting or the video camera’s software. A room-based system is enabled for those types of video conferencing systems and to call in NetMeeting clients specifically as a participant in a video conference but without scheduling capabilities. Streaming is enabled to allow conferences to be recorded for later viewing for larger audience distribution. If Microsoft Encoder Server is installed with the Click to Meet plug-in, streaming can be set up and then viewed using Media Player or through a Web link.

The last part of the configuration involved setting up the resources used for particular video conferences. When scheduling a conference, a resource must be included so that the specific settings are known. From the Exchange Conference Manager, we could set up the properties for each resource we wanted. Some of the configurations here include choosing the layout for the Click to Meet Web conference, audio codec being used (G.711 or G.723), video codec (H.261 or H.263), and choosing the resolution of the videoconference (CIF, QCIF, and SQCIF). The resolution depends on which video codec is used and if continuous presence is enabled or not. Continuous presence always shows the last four speakers on the screen during a video conference, so it must use the H.261 codec and QCIF resolution. Voice-activated switching, which focuses on a single speaker at any given time, can use any video codec and resolution. Also note: Click to Meet accommodates the user with the lowest bandwidth in a conference while still giving the maximum bandwidth for other users. In this way, Click to Meet does not revert to the quality of the video of the person with the lowest bandwidth.

OPERATIONAL TESTING
Setting up a conference is very similar to scheduling a regular calendar item in Microsoft Outlook. We scheduled meetings directly from Outlook, remembering to check the online meeting box and selecting Microsoft Exchange Conference. When inviting attendees, we made sure to select the appropriate conference resource. We also set up streaming as a user so that streaming could be added to the conference. Think of it as a moderator in a chat room -- the streaming is filming the conference behind the scenes but still needs to be a “participant” in the conference.

After sending the calendar item, we received a message containing a link associated with that meeting. When it was time for the meeting, we could click on the link or click the Join Conference button on Microsoft Exchange. After we did this, we were given a choice of what type of client we wanted to use: CUSeeMe Web (Click to Meet’s client), NetMeeting, H.323 end point, or streamed conference (if this is included in the particular conference). We preferred the CUSeeMe Web client because we could use a template that would best fit our needs while still having the T.120 collaboration features available. The NetMeeting client also worked well, except for the annoyance of having to accept the call twice every time we joined a conference in this manner. It is also nice to be able to include any H.323 end point into a conference even if the device has no video component. For example, a person with an H.323 IP phone can join in audibly. This is feasible through a gatekeeper. In addition, the next release of Click to Meet, which may be out by the time you read this review, will support SIP equipment, including instant messaging on Windows XP. Instant messaging is supported on this version, but not for XP’s latest SIP version.

During one video conference, we invited a CUSeeMe Web client, a NetMeeting client, and a room-based system and streamed the call. This type of conference connected easily, except for when the room-based system was not ready. If this happened, we were forced to cancel the meeting and then reschedule it. When the room-based system was up, we joined the conference again, and all the systems were connected. If using the CUSeeMe Web client, we had to make sure to turn on the microphone. Every time, we first joined the conference, the microphone was off. We couldn’t find a way to arrange the microphone default to be “on.” As for the quality of the audio, there was some delay, but we could hear each other clearly, using either the G.711 or the G.723 audio codec. The video quality depended on what equipment we were using -- the conference room-based system had the best quality while our old dinky USB camera had the worst quality. Collaboration, including chat and white boarding, was accomplished without a problem between NetMeeting and/or CUSeeMe clients. We should also mention that it did take a few seconds for the video to come up clearly.

CONCLUSION
Click to Meet for Exchange does what it advertises and does it with minimal headaches. The most difficult part about administering this version of Click to Meet is navigating through Exchange, but once you overcome that initial hurdle (and a few other bumps learning the product), this system could be of great benefit to those that are committed to video conferencing. At this point, the video conferencing industry has come far enough to seriously consider implementing it. With Click to Meet, conferences can be held through almost any system and client over the Internet or on a network and can be administered from one central location. In addition, the software-based Conference Server has most of the capabilities of its hardware MCU counterparts but costs less and offers built-in T.120 collaboration. Overall, Click to Meet offers a somewhat unique and flexible solution that could help revolutionize the way companies do business.

[ Return To The January 2002 Table Of Contents ]