| The Standards Advantage
BY ALLAN ZANDER
Both industry and consumer interest in simplifying voice and video
communication over the Internet has skyrocketed. Each month, more Web
sites are dedicated to improving these technologies. Buzzwords like "speechweb"
are becoming household names in the high-tech homestead. Until now, the
implementation of telephony features (dial tone, call waiting, forwarding,
messaging, hold, etc.) has remained the exclusive charge of proprietary
enterprise voice companies. Built and sold as large, whole systems, voice
solutions employed proprietary protocols that made use of unique coding
and transmission standards. While the recent move toward developing open
and universal voice communication standards over existing Internet
protocols promises remarkable benefits for manufacturers, carriers, and
individual users, the full potential of IP telephony will only be realized
through the extension of its benefits to the working world -- the
enterprise customer.
WORKPLACE GAINS: TRANSLATING STANDARDS INTO SOLUTIONS
The implementation of IP telephony standards makes building a
voice-over-IP (VoIP) network an attractive communications option for
enterprises. Gains resulting from the institution of industry-level
standards are notable, and include:
Increased service options, enhanced features -- Major
enterprise PBX products generally include many hundreds of features and
highly reliable call control. The general architecture for making these
features possible and for providing the call control comes from a
master/slave approach. The end devices in an enterprise solution are dumb
-- whenever a feature needs to be added or enhanced, the entire code for
the PBX must be modified and verified. With this approach, adding or
enhancing features can take years. Open standards on IP give the PBX
freedom, allowing software to reside elsewhere on the network and greatly
simplifying the feature's development.
Increased compatibility/interoperability -- The switch
from proprietary to standard protocols frees manufacturers from the
constraints of PBX-specific design, which will significantly expand the
number of manufacturers producing individual IP telephony components. The
resulting variety of components will allow enterprise customers to build
their IP telephony systems and comparison shop for the various
interchangeable, plug-and-play components of their choice, increasing the
attractiveness of the solution.
Reduced costs -- Open standards allow enterprise
manufacturers to simplify telephony products and devices by reducing the
amount of memory and power that they require. When simpler products are
paired with increased competition in the vendor market, costs should
plummet.
Increased flexibility -- The acceptance of quality
standards allows the enterprise customer to assess their business
requirements and select the appropriate standard based on their unique
requirements and priorities. For example, while SIP may enable fewer
features than other protocols, its cost-efficiency and low processing
requirements make it attractive when controlling the component costs of
the product.
Faster processing and information transmittal --
Standardized voice, control, and telephony feature programming signals
will not only provide the means for audio and video signals to move as
data between IP-addressable components, but enable manufacturers and
research organizations to improve and advance programs to interpret and
process these signals more efficiently, and bring more R&D resources
to the table. IP addressing will also enable remote, shared, and
consequently more powerful computers to control voice communications.
Increased user proficiency -- The more familiar the tool,
the higher the level of proficiency. When tools are easier for end users
to use, their productivity rises, to the ultimate benefit of their
employers.
AN APPEAL FOR STANDARDS
Prior to the introduction of standards, the IP telephony world was a
cacophony of competing voices, a choir of dissonant soloists haphazardly
thrown together, more comfortable singing in isolation. Stand-alone,
incompatible proprietary protocols required both parties in a conversation
to use the same products to communicate. Given their self-contained
intelligence and independence from a central switch, IP phones and devices
were complex and costly. As VoIP gained in popularity, it became evident
that its full potential would only be realized with the development of
cost-effective, interchangeable, flexible PBX solutions. And so telephony
standards were called to impose harmony on the choir. The challenge:
create standards that recognize (address) all current devices and that
are:
- Open-ended, to recognize the not-yet-invented devices of the future.
- Able to accommodate the quantity of those devices as they are
developed.
- Robust enough to recognize and communicate all features offered by
each device.
- Simple enough to be understood and used by the entire manufacturing
industry.
- Logical and consistent, to provide a foundation for a simple,
accessible user interface.
THE PILLARS OF PROTOCOL
The mechanisms necessary to enable end systems and proxy servers to supply
a variety of features to enterprise customers are provided by the four
main pillars of IP telephony protocol (see Table 1 for more details):
- H.323: The longest standing telephony protocol, H.323
is used to define the parameters of audiovisual conferencing and data
transmission across networks.
- Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): SIP is a
lightweight, text-based signaling protocol used mainly to establish,
modify, and terminate voice calls.
- Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP): MGCP is a data
signaling protocol used to transmit primarily audio signals over the
Internet and other packet networks.
- Megaco (H.248): An enhancement of MGCP and an offshoot
of H.323, Megaco is a call control protocol that supports a broader
range of networks, has substantial trunking capabilities, gives IP
networks tight connectivity, and allows for faster call routing.
Table 1
| Standards |
Benefits |
Limitations |
| SIP |
Lightweight.
Cost-effective. Larger address space in the packet header allows
more features to be addressed. Neutral to lower OSI lay- ers;
transportable on any current pro- tocol. Text-based similar to HTTP
enables easy programming of fea- tures. Peer-to-peer. |
Fewer
features. Newer, less widely used. Difficult to tunnel through a
firewall. Mostly voice- oriented applications, could be connected to
data transmission at a later date. |
| H.323 |
Longest-standing
protocol (since 1996); adopted by many current communication devices
and mecha- nisms (e.g., Microsoft NetMeeting). Peer-to-peer.Offers
standards for non-guaranteed QoS networks. Incorporates voice
(standard G.711), video signaling (standard H.240/5), and data
(standard T.120) capabilities; based on common methods of
transmission |
Weightier;
requires more power to run effectively on a network. Difficult to
understand and imple- ment. Binary protocol based on ASN.1
notation/encoding. Contains a lot for "just" a
conversation. |
| MGCP |
Greater
universality; serves as an interpreter providing universally avail-
able networking "hooks" that can also be used to maintain
and com- municate telephony features. Simple. |
Standardizes
the communication between network devices only; assumes call-control
intelligence is handled by another device. Master- Slave approach.
No data or video capabilities. Not much continued effort to further
develop the protocol given the advent of Megaco. |
| Megaco/H.248 |
Leverages
existing switched circuit networks, making implementation fast,
easy, and cost-effective. Makes implementations of H.323 gateways
highly scalable. Allows low-cost gate- way devices to interface in a
standard way with signaling systems found in conventional telephone
networks. |
Restricted
to Internet telephone device control. Newest protocol, announced
August 4, 2000. |
A PATH TO PROGRESS
Given its benefits, it is not surprising that efforts made to
establish IP telephony on the telecommunications stage enjoy formidable
industry support. Standards allow IP telephony technology designers and
manufacturers to use their products interchangeably, develop new features
faster, cheaper, and better than in the past, and expand their product
options. Future features will be derived from features available on
residential lines -- features like the SS7-built *6 functionality will
eventually be available to enterprise customers directly through their
IP-PBX.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
facilitates the standardization efforts undertaken by industry and other
players. Scheduled bake-offs -- conferences attended by members of all
four standards committees -- provide a forum for comparing and contrasting
technologies, assessing progress, and resolving conflicts. The union of
the North American-based Comité Consultatif International Téléphonique
et Télégraphique (CCITT), and its parent company, the European-based
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), reflects the direction toward
a worldwide set of telephony and other communication and infrastructure
standards.
TRANSFORMING COMMUNICATIONS
IP telephony solutions, made increasingly reliable and accessible through
standardization, have the potential to completely transform the ways in
which enterprises communicate and make use of the systems that enable
communication. The combined efforts of manufacturers, researchers and
developers, and other players are laying the groundwork for a
telecommunications revolution from which enterprises will reap great
rewards. The development and implementation of standards represents a
significant commitment to making the technology simpler, more efficient,
and accessible.
Allan Zander is director of product marketing, Destop Peripherals
and Applications for Mitel Corporation.
[ Return
To The February 2001 Table Of Contents ]
|