| The following
letter refers to Kevin Mayer's article, titled "Softswitch
Emergence," in the October issue.
To the editor:
Thanks for the well-done article on softswitches
that recently came out in Communications Solutions
magazine. I would be interested if you could tell me
why you left out the Centile offering, which Song
Networks just rolled out. That offering won a TMC Labs
Innovation Award last year, when it was offered by
Netergy Networks under the title of Advanced Telephony
System.
I am guessing you just overlooked it because of
name changes at the parent company, 8x8, Inc. It
became Netergy Networks for about a year and then went
back to being 8x8 when founder Joe Parkinson came back
as C.E.O. Then Centile was made a separate division.
So the Netergy ATS of last year is now the Centile
hosted iPBX.
Here are some links backing that up:
TMC Award (look under Netergy):
http://www.tmcnet.com/articles/comsol/1000/1000labsawards.htm#14
Song Networks (SONW) announcement of hosted PBX: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010924/240002_1.html
Identification that Song's offering is from Centile:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/010924/sfm099_1.html
and
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/011008/sfm081_1.html
Centile and Netergy now divisions of 8x8, Inc.: http://www.8x8.com/
Please let me know if there was any other reason
you didn't include Centile.
Thank you,
Bob Collinge
Kevin Mayer responds:
Dear Mr. Collinge,
Thanks for your interest in our recent overview of
softswitches. Although we try to be comprehensive in
our overviews, we sometimes omit mention of
interesting companies and products, not deliberately,
but simply because many market segments are both
crowded and volatile, and it's dismayingly easy to
overlook individual companies, especially when they
don't take the initiative and contact us, even though
we pre-announce overview topics in our editorial
calendar.
In many segments, the old "build a better mousetrap"
idea is much in effect. Many believe that though they
may reside in a dark wood, all they need do is build a
better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to
their door. This belief is often derided by marketing
professionals, but these days, marketing people are
just the people who are experiencing the brunt of
layoffs in the struggling technology sector. As this
trend continues, the mousetrap-oriented engineering
view is reinforced.
I feel the trend is especially pronounced among
softswitch vendors, which have, to date, won more "ink"
with less effort than many other next-gen voice/data
specialists. I almost detect an air of complacency
with many softswitch vendors, as though editorial and
reader attention were their due. Human nature, I
suppose. When you grant many interviews, any one
interview assumes less importance. You may even forget
that it may be in your interest to actively seek
interviews. Or you may imagine that if you've seized
an editor's attention but once, you're made an
impression that will last for months or years.
Will companies suffer if they indulge in such
complacency? Perhaps, especially since magazines are
growing slimmer, and editorial space is becoming more
precious. Part of the overall shakeout, and it would
seem a shakeout among softswitches is imminent, since
there are so many softswitch vendors. Time will tell.
In the meantime, I'll try to be as fair and as open as
I can be, within the practical constraints imposed by
tight deadlines and the wearing of many hats that is
typical in publishing.
The following letter refers to Tom Keating's Cc:
column in our September issue:
Tom:
I can't tell you how cathartic it was reading your "Nightmare
on CRM Street" story in the September Communications
Solutions magazine after having just gone through
customer service hell in getting my new DSL service up
and running. There is an untold story somewhere in the
lost productivity associated with poor customer
service. Everybody experiences it and seemingly more
frequently. We need to read these types of stories
every now and then to offset the hype promulgated by
the vendors of "miracle-promising" CRM software and
services. So much technology, so little efficacy.
Best Regards,
Brian D. Boyer
People interested in contributing to Communications
Solutions are welcome to view our editorial
calendar online and contact the editor who handles the appropriate
section (Enabling
Technologies, Corporate
Solutions,
Interactive Commerce, Next-Gen Networks/Services).
Our editorial guidelines can be found here.
Please contact managing editor Carol
Bancroft with any questions.
[ Return
To The November 2001 Table Of Contents ]
|