| When the
subject is communications technology, or information technology generally,
marketers seldom spare the rhetoric of creativity. Whether they're
promoting a platform, a product, or a service, the marketers insist that
the customer is no mere consumer, but a partner, a collaborator, a fellow
"change agent." The message, then, is that technology will not
debase or obviate human skills; rather, it will enhance and extend them.
And so it is that Leonardo is repeatedly stirred from his tomb, so that he
may lend his artistic and technical authority to product launches and
upgrades. Advertisements for IBM challenge us to embrace epiphanies. And
Microsoft asks, "Where do you want to go today?" -- as though a
mouse-click was inspiration, a thrilling escape from the mundane.
But all these examples are from the mass market, where appeals are
directed towards the end user. Surely, the rhetoric of creativity is used
more sparingly along the intermediate reaches of the value chain. Well,
not exactly. Those who dispense the rhetoric of creativity are just as
likely to receive it. Platform providers, developers, and vendors of all
types encourage each other to outsource wherever possible -- to avoid
"reinventing the wheel" -- and to instead focus on their core
competency, their unique value-add. The idea, in broad terms, is to shun
that which is mere drudgery, and to embrace that which is stimulating and,
ultimately, remunerative. Don't slave, create.
Well, we'd all like to think of ourselves as artists within our own
domains. For example, business strategists study The Art of War,
and those who speak of revolution seem less likely to fortify barricades
than to frequent a salon, counting themselves among the avant-garde,
contemplating the shock of the new. But does the rhetoric of creativity
have anything more than superficial appeal? I would suppose so, since it
is so pervasive and finds such varied expression. However, if I am to
accept that the rhetoric of creativity does resonate for many throughout
communications, I'm compelled to ask why. What, I ask, does art have to do
with communications?
Quite a lot, as it turns out. To see how this may be the case, we just
have to consider prevailing trends in communications, putting them in a
new light, and comparing them to the processes that give rise to
traditional art forms. In communications, the key trends are convergence
and the success of mass market components (particularly the incorporation
of these components within increasingly specialized and ambitious
applications). These two trends -- convergence and "building
block" development -- happen to coincide with artistic processes
known as genre-crossing and the "elevation of the popular."
MIXING GENRES, REFINING THE BASE
Let's take a closer look at these processes; briefly consider how they
work in the arts (music, the visual arts, and literature), and decide how
they may apply to communications. If we consult the Art of Fiction,
we read that "the artist's primary unit of thought -- his primary
conscious or unconscious basis for selecting and organizing the details of
his work -- is genre. Whatever genre he chooses, and to some extent
depending on which genre he chooses, he writes within, or slightly varies,
traditional structures." In the case of music, a composer may
elaborate on sonata form or fugal structure, or produce concertos or
symphonies. And, while doing so, the composer may hew closely to
traditional structures, modify them, or create new structures. He may
cross genres, developing symphonic treatments for themes derived from folk
songs, for example -- or like Gershwin, Ravel, and Stravinsky -- blend
classical technique and American jazz.
This last example, in addition to illustrating genre crossing, also
demonstrates the elevation of popular culture. And the same processes also
apply to the visual arts. Genre-crossing, for example, is evident when we
see compositions pioneered in Biblical illustration modified for use in
literary illustration. And elevation of popular culture is evident in the
trash collages of Robert Rauschenberg, or Andy Warhol's silk screens of
Campbell's soup cans (talk about "off the shelf").
Moving from the visual arts to literature, we can see that here, too,
novelty comes chiefly from ingenious genre-crossing or elevation of
familiar materials. If we again consult The Art of Fiction, we read
that "Shakespeare's most powerful techniques are all results of
genre-crossing: his combination of prose and verse to expand the emotional
range of drama; his combination of Roman high-style convention with
conventions drawn from the English folk plays, rowdy medieval mystery
plays (or guild plays), and so on; and his crossing of tragic convention
and comic convention for the dark comedies."
And, with respect to literature's elevation of the popular, we read
that the novel had its origins in the transformation of trash:
"Robinson Crusoe and Moll Flanders spring, respectively, from the
naive shipwreck narrative and the rogue's confession; Pamela and Clarissa
add character and plot to the popular collection of epistolary models for
the guidance of young ladies; Jonathan Wilde comes from the gallows
broadside, or story of the character and horrible crimes of the felon
about to be hanged."
WELCOME TO THE SALON
What does all this have to do with communications solutions? Well, let's
start with genre-crossing, and ask what might constitute a genre here, in
the communications space. You could say that voice communications -- such
as that accomplished by traditional, circuit-switched infrastructures --
constitutes a genre. Similarly, IP-based networking could constitute a
genre. And, accordingly, packet telephony could be taken as an example of
genre-crossing.
It is even possible to apply the principle at a finer level of detail.
Consider any overlapping of once-distinct boundaries. Combine the
manipulation of databases with call center operations and you've got
customer relationship management (CRM). Combine call center functionality
with the Internet and you've got the Web-enabled call center, or
voice-enabled e-commerce. Combine IVR-style functionality and speech
recognition with the Web, and you've got a voice portal. Combine telephony
functionality and next-generation networking, and you've got a
communications applications service provider (CASP).
It is no surprise, then, that vendor representatives are so touchy
about having their companies (or even particular products and services)
categorized. For these representatives, familiar labels seldom suffice,
and they're often heard to cry, "But we're more than just [fill in
the blank]." If only I had a dollar for every time I heard that one.
To give these people their due, they often have a point (and sometimes
they don't -- but that's the communications solutions aesthete in me
talking). Companies in this space are under constant competitive pressure
to "push the envelope," to encompass broader, richer bundles of
functionality. Commodity status is anathema. In fact, these companies
dread hearing "commodity" quite as much as the aspiring artist
fears hearing the critic sniff, "derivative."
THE SHOCK OF THE OPEN
The other process explored in this column -- the elevation of the popular
-- is also at work in communications solutions. In this space, the process
often accomplishes the sort of change described in The Innovator's
Dilemma, which explains how commercial success can leave a technology
vulnerable to marginalization, as accretions to an originally clean and
elegant innovation result in greater complexity and expense, while a
cheaper, simpler alternative takes over low-end applications, incorporates
improvements, and ultimately wins mainstream acceptance. And, of course,
the alternative may itself become a victim of its own success.
In communications solutions, the elevation process is evident in at
least two trends. First, we have the elevation of voice over IP (VoIP) to
packet telephony. Originally, VoIP was a curiosity, falling well short of
toll-quality voice. However, the VoIP alternative attracted sufficient
interest to support initiatives introducing such telephony-grade
essentials as quality of service (QoS), signaling capabilities,
interoperability, and carrier-level scalability. And now packet telephony
has progressed so far that "next-generation network" promises to
augment and (over the long term) ultimately replace the traditional public
switched telephone network (PSTN).
The second trend is the transition from closed, vertically oriented,
and proprietary platforms to open, horizontally oriented, and
standards-based platforms for the development and deployment of
communications solutions. A case in point: CompactPCI, a more-or-less
standard combination of embedded processing, a telephony-compatible
backplane, and Eurocard packaging, is introducing PC economies of scale to
telephony development, including telephony development in the carrier
space. Carrier concerns, such as availability and density, are currently
the focus of proprietary extensions to the original CompactPCI
specification. Eventually, these extensions themselves may be
standardized.
THE ELECTRONIC WORD
To return, if briefly, to the world of the visual arts, we could consider
an argument developed in The Painted Word, which cheekily suggested that
painting hadn't just progressed from Biblical illustration to literary
illustration, it had, in the more extreme examples of modern art, finally
succeeded in illustrating theories about painting itself. A provocative
thesis. Is it possible to see an abstract painting -- which might distill
experience and expression into a spatial puzzle or an index of gestures --
in the absence of a persuasive theory?
And would communications technology, itself as abstract as the word
"code" would imply, permit a corollary to the argument? Is it
possible to understand a technology's significance in the absence of
context? If not, then one would hope that anyone attempting to provide
such context would be less overbearing than the oppressive critics
depicted in The Painted Word. Neither creation nor innovation is a
purely intellectual exercise. No formula will suffice to account for the
artist's work, any more than mere technique is capable of grinding out
useful scientific hypotheses. Intuition counts. Even whimsy counts -- in
the sense it may emphasize that all rules are tentative, and that,
ultimately, anything goes. The implication, in communications solutions,
is that familiarity with a broad range of market spaces could aid in
understanding the tumult of technological innovation, for who can say
which genres might cross next? Or how the "elevation of the
popular" might manifest in the future?
Fortunately, this forum -- this magazine -- is all about context. And,
with the benefit of context, it may be easier to see how isolated market
spaces -- development components, enterprise systems, customer interaction
applications, broadband access, next-gen networking -- relate to each
other as well as to greater trends in computing, communications, and
convergence. Accordingly, my recommendation is that readers become
familiar with this publication, so that they may acquaint themselves with
the sources of innovation and change in the communications solutions
space. We recognize that innovation emerges from the interstices, the
shadow zones where distinctions disappear and categories collapse, where
genres cross and the base aspires to the ethereal, and where convergence
on IP is the ultimate elixir.
[ Return
To The December 2000 Table Of Contents ] |
| Revisiting
A Classic Theme
Years ago, when I was on the staff of TMC's Telemarketing
magazine (now known as Customer Inter@ction Solutions magazine),
the editorial staff would sometimes discuss whether, for our purposes,
there was any useful distinction between PBXs and ACDs. Nearly every PBX
of interest to us offered ACD functionality, if not a suite of call center
applications.
And then, a little later, with the introduction of PC-PBXs, several
vendors ventured beyond business phone functionality, and emphasized ACD
and call center functionality (by this time, TMC had already launched CTI
magazine). These vendors included Interactive Intelligence and Buffalo
International (now known as Calltrol).
And now, we once again see a gradual unfolding of call center
functionality, but this time with the rise of IP-PBXs. To borrow an idea
expressed in this column's main text, what we have here is an instance of
genre-crossing, between business phone systems and ACD/call center
applications. At first, IP-PBXs were hard-pressed to offer anything more
than a subset of the business phone functionality that would be taken for
granted with a traditional, circuit-switched PBX. However, the IP-PBX is
maturing, offering a fuller complement of traditional PBX functions, and
-- in some instances -- crossing over into the ACD/call center realm. A
few examples:
- 3Com Corporation: Together with marchFIRST, 3Com has
introduced Contact Advantage, which the companies characterize as an
integrated turnkey contact center for small to mid-sized businesses.
Contact Advantage combines 3Com's NBX LAN telephony system with call
center software from vendors such as Apropos Technology. Versions of
the solution include IP cContact, Web, Contact, and Ultimate Contact.
This last version, as the name might suggest, includes CRM
functionality.
- Alcatel Internetworking: Offering what it characterizes as a
hybrid approach -- which, from a hardware perspective, enables the use
of digital phones or IP phones -- Alcatel notes that its OmniPCX 4400
offers not just a full range of PBX functions but also ACD and IVR
features, as well as Web-based customer contact center functionality.
- Avaya Communications: In a flurry of announcements following
its spin-off from Lucent, Avaya indicates its IP600 Communications
Server offers a full range of PBX features -- including voice mail,
fax messaging, message manager, and site administration applications
-- as well as IP customer contact center functionality that supports
advanced call routing. Avaya characterizes the new products as
Enterprise Class IP Solutions, or ECLIPS products. Presumably this
name is meant to suggest that IP-based systems are eclipsing
traditional PBXs.
- Cisco Systems: Building on its AVVID (Architecture for Voice,
Video, and Integrated Data) framework, Cisco announced that its
enterprise-oriented IP telephony systems wil encompass "enhanced
customer care through convergence." Specifically, Cisco cited
these solutions: the IP Contact Center (IPCC), the Cisco
Auto-Attendant, and the Cisco Web Attendant. The IPCC, which is based
on the Cisco Intelligent Contact Management software, includes such
capabilities as intelligent call routing, ACD functionality,
network-to-desktop CTI, and consolidated reporting.
- Vertical Networks: In partnership with Interactive
Intelligence, Vertical announced a portfolio of integrated call center
solutions for its InstantOffice Integrated Communications Platform.
Vertical, which is focusing on branch offices and small businesses,
plans two offerings: the entry-level Call Routing and Queuing (CRQ)
and the more feature-rich InstantOffice Contact Center (IOCC), which
offers such functionality as ACD, skills-based routing, multimedia
queuing, IVR, and reporting and Web capabilities.
With these examples, the trend is clear: IP-PBX vendors are carrying
out a form of genre-crossing so that they may enrich their offerings and
differentiate themselves from their competition. What's next? More
genre-crossing, and more differentiation. We can anticipate that further
announcements in this space will include moves to greater scale,
elaboration of call center and e-commerce capabilities, integration with
broadband access technologies and partnerships with service providers (to
create communications ASP offerings), and moves towards optimizing
applications for various vertical markets.
[ Return
To The December 2000 Table Of Contents ] |